AB
Search Product
showing 1 - 8 of 864 results
{{maindata.mainmenu}}

{{maindata.submenu.desc}}

{{maindata.submenu.col_1.type}}

{{maindata.submenu.col_1.title}}

{{maindata.submenu.col_1.desc}}

{{maindata.mainmenu}}
{{maindata.submenu.mainnav.title}}
{{maindata.submenu.resource.title}}
{{maindata.submenu.dashboard.title}}

Global Market Perspective

Navigating Policy Inflections…and Looking for Value. Recent economic data and US Fed rhetoric suggest continued accommodation. Lending in Europe and Japan is picking up, which could bring additional liquidity. We see increasing opportunity to take advantage of divergence in fundamentals and valuations.

How We’re Positioned and Where Opportunities Are

Our positioning continues to reflect a largely procyclical and pro-risk stance, with portfolios structured to take advantage of sustained global monetary-policy support. This is expressed largely through the use of long-term energy futures and non-US equities (Display).

GMP Quarterly Video
CHART OF THE MONTH
Current Positioning
Highlights
  • Incremental data point to a more accommodative Fed, but the pace of rate hikes and the final equilibrium rate will be determined by small- business hiring and labor force participation
  • We’re seeing signs that ECB and BOJ policies are stimulating credit creation, which could help offset Fed tightening
  • Our portfolio exposures are largely procyclical and pro-risk, structured to take advantage of an improving economic environment
  • We see opportunities in emerging-market stocks, but aggregate valuations argue for being selective rather than increasing overall exposure

This publication offers investors a systematic, comprehensive assessment of the global economy and the world’s capital markets. Using a short horizon, we analyze current and emerging trends, risks and opportunities across countries, regions and asset classes, providing perspective on the global investing landscape investors face today. These materials present the viewpoint of the Multi-Asset team and do not necessarily represent the views of other AB portfolio-management teams.

Vadim Zlotnikov

Chief Market Strategist &
Co-Head—Multi-Asset Solutions

Speak to an Expert

Our team of portfolio managers is available to discuss your needs.

'First Name' is required
'Last Name' is required
'Email' is required
Submit

However, we’re hedging against the potential resurfacing of short-term deflation and economic slowdown fears by setting up carry trades in fixed income. For example, we’re long higher-yielding US bonds and short euro bonds. We also hold market-hedged exposure to high-dividend-yielding equities in Europe and high-dividend-growth equities in Japan. In our Factor Fund portfolios, we’re emphasizing relative growth in the US, while we’re more leveraged to value and income in Europe and Japan. At this point, we remain defensively positioned in Asia ex Japan as we monitor earnings revisions and profitability trends for signs of improvement.

During March, our portfolios were generally hurt by a slight underperformance in equities (where we’re overweight) and outperformance by bonds (we’re underweight). Within our equity allocation, the portfolios benefited from an overweight of non-US equities (Performance); Japan and Europe outperformed the US by 3%–4%.

Energy and related equities significantly underperformed because of concerns about incremental supply from Iran and evidence of further inventory buildup in the US. We remain overweight oil-price-sensitive exposures across many of our portfolios.

The US dollar continued to strengthen against most currencies except the yuan. The dollar’s three-year surge now ranks among the largest in history. We remain modestly overweight: we continue to see upside over the next six to nine months, although there’s near-term downside risk from weaker employment data and negative economic surprises in the US as well as relative improvements in Europe and Japan. The rationale for our position is our expectation of superior relative growth in the US, a September lift-off in rate hikes by the US Federal Reserve, and continued US-dollar demand from the refinancing of corporate debt.

High-yield and investment-grade spreads rose in developed markets but declined in emerging markets. In our view, emerging-market yields, credit spreads, equities and currencies are among the few areas of distressed valuations in the world today. The performance of emerging-market assets seems to be benefiting from the perception that the Fed could remain accommodative for longer, while credit creation in Europe and Japan should continue to provide ample liquidity. The anticipated effectiveness of new quantitative easing measures likely caused long-term bond yields and credit spreads in the euro area to decline.

This month, we look at three key issues. First, what do recent employment data and the Fed’s interest-rate guidance imply? Second, is the hand-off from the Fed to the European Central Bank (ECB) and Bank of Japan (BOJ) as liquidity providers happening smoothly? And third, what opportunities do we see in emerging markets, particularly in equities? We’ll look at currency and fixed-income opportunities in later reports.

Don’t Get Complacent with Fed Accommodation

March payroll data disappointed, and data for prior months were revised down, raising questions about the speed and magnitude of the US economic recovery. This also strengthens the case for later tightening by the Fed. We continue to expect the initial rate hike in September, but the pace of rate increases may be much slower than what we saw in 1994 and 2004.

The timing of the initial increase will likely be driven more by evidence of improving wages and unemployment rates than by specific job-creation targets. There are many leading indicators of labor-market health: Fed Chair Janet Yellen referenced at least nine on her own “dashboard.” But we’re monitoring two that we believe are particularly important, as we discussed in our November 2014 Global Market Perspective: small-business sentiment/hiring intentions and labor participation.

Small-business sentiment and hiring intentions are important because small businesses account for more than 60% of new job creation. This gauge continues to indicate strong job-growth prospects (Display 1). The labor participation rate matters because it provides a sense of labor supply, and it remains fairly tight (Display 2).

Display 1

Unemployment Rate and Small-Business Hiring Intentions

Through March 31, 2015

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Haver Analytics, National Federation of

Independent Businesses survey and AB

Display 2

Labor Participation Rate

Through March 31, 2015

Source: Federal Reserve Economic Data and AB

These indicators, combined with a pickup in wage growth during March, suggest that there’s limited slack in the US job market. Wage growth should get a further boost in April from recently announced compensation increases in the retail sector. Moreover, the one-off negative impacts of West Coast port delays on trucking jobs and a weather-related slowdown in construction are likely to reverse in coming months.

The pace of increase and the eventual equilibrium rate may be more relevant to determining market outcomes than the timing of the initial rate hike. The March Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting suggests a more dovish stance than before with references to a lower NAIRU (non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment), the impact of a stronger dollar on growth and lower equilibrium interest rates.

Perhaps the most bullish indicator for the equity market—and for risk assets—from the most recent FOMC meeting was the lowering of median guidance for official short-term rates (Display 3). The FOMC’s 2015 year-end guidance came down to levels that have been implied by the futures markets for some time. But 2016 year-end guidance remains about 60 basis points higher than market-implied rates (Display 4). Will the market be surprised if the Fed maintains the current guidance and follows through on roughly 175 basis points of rate increases by the end of 2016?

Display 3

Evolution of 2015 Fed Funds Rate Expectations over Time

As of March 31, 2015

Source: Bloomberg, US Federal Reserve and AB

Display 4

Fed Funds Rate Expectations: Futures vs. FOMC

As of March 31, 2015

Source: Bloomberg, US Federal Reserve and AB

History suggests that futures provide a fair bit of information about near-term rate levels, but they tend to be far less accurate beyond 12 months out. Further, market expectations of fed funds rates have tended to steepen sharply after the first rate hike. This makes sense, because the Fed rarely raises rates just one time. For example, in 2004, the futures market began to correctly anticipate year-end rate levels almost three months before the first Fed hike in June of that year (Display 5). Meanwhile, 2005 year-end futures rose sharply with the first Fed hike, but didn’t anticipate the full magnitude of the eventual rate increase until much later (Display 6).

Display 5

Rate Rise Cycle Starting June 2004

As of March 31, 2015

Source: Bloomberg, US Federal Reserve and AB

Display 6

Evolution of Dec 2005 Fed Funds Rate Futures

As of March 31, 2015

Source: Bloomberg, US Federal Reserve and AB

So we don’t view the current environment as particularly unusual, and we don’t expect the market to be overly surprised by the Fed’s actions. If history is a reasonable guide, we would expect the futures market to begin anticipating September rate hikes by July or August. During that time, we’d also expect 2016 futures to imply higher interest rates.

Signs of Credit Creation—and Additional Global Liquidity

We’re seeing some comforting signs that ECB and BOJ policy actions are stimulating credit creation, which could provide additional liquidity to offset the impact of the Fed’s initiation of tighter policies.

It would be a stretch to describe bank lending in the euro area and Japan as robust. But loan growth has improved from the dismal levels of six months ago (Display 7), and growth in monetary aggregates has accelerated significantly. The sustainability of this growth is an important element in offsetting tighter Fed policy. Loose Fed policy had created a substantial amount of dollar-denominated loans, especially among emerging-market corporate borrowers (Display 8).

Display 7

YoY Credit Growth

As of March 31, 2015

Source: Bloomberg and AB

Display 8

EM USD-Denominated Credit

Through March 31, 2015

Source: Bank for International Settlements and AB

Emerging-market borrowing from Japanese banks appears to have picked up significantly (Display 9), reversing the post-2008 falloff in borrowing. While US bank lending to emerging markets is 8% below its March 2013 peak, growth in Japanese bank lending has more than offset the difference. If it lasts, this could bode well for emerging-market corporate credit and, more generally, high-yield debt. There’s still a hurdle to refinancing dollar-denominated debt following the recent appreciation in the dollar, but at least we’re not seeing any problems with borrowers accessing financing facilities.

Display 9

Foreign Claims by Bank Domicile on Emerging Countries

Through March 31, 2015

Source: Bank for International Settlements and AB

Growing differences in credit spreads are also impacting the patterns of credit growth. Five-year cross-currency swaps for euro/US dollar and yen/US dollar are trading at an increasingly negative basis (Display 10), indicating that banks requiring US-dollar currency in exchange for the euro or yen for five years must accept a negative spread to their local interbank rates.

Display 10

5-Year Cross-Currency Swap Basis: JPY/USD and EUR/USD

Through March 31, 2015

Source: Bloomberg and AB

The negative basis could indicate outsize demand for dollar liquidity, which happened in 2008 and 2011. But in those two earlier periods, a crisis was the culprit; short-term cross-currency swaps this time remain relatively quiet. What we’re seeing is most likely tied to a difference in US credit spreads versus Europe and Japan (Display 11). This gap allows investment-grade corporations to borrow in euros or yen at a lower credit spread than US-dollar loans. Corporates often then have to convert the proceeds to US dollars to fund local operations or refinance existing loans. We’ve already witnessed a sharp increase in euro-area bond issuance (Display 12), which was primarily driven by US corporations.

Display 11

Credit Spreads for 4- to 7-Year Maturity

Through March 31, 2015

Source: Bloomberg and AB

Display 12

EUR Debt Issuance by US Nonfinancials and EM

Through March 31, 2015

Source: Nomura Holdings and AB

The negative basis on the interest-rate swap effectively offsets the benefit of lower credit spreads outside the US. The end result: firms can borrow in euros and reduce their financial costs, but that advantage is neutralized once they try to convert the proceeds into dollars over the course of the loan.

Emerging Markets: Last Remaining Value Opportunity or Typical Value Trap?

Emerging-market equity returns are essentially flat since mid-2011, even as the MSCI World Index of developed-market equities returned roughly 50%. Likewise, many emerging currencies have collapsed versus the US dollar (Display 13), and emerging-market high-yield credit spreads are high compared with history (Valuations: Equities/Bonds, Display 5). This landscape suggests value opportunities in the area.

Display 13

Recent EM Currency Depreciation vs. USD

As of March 31, 2015

Source: Bloomberg and AB

But average returns or valuations can be misleading—and so can the time frame you evaluate.

In the case of emerging-market equities, average valuations are down significantly since 2011, but they’re still only modestly below their longer-term averages (Display 14). Within emerging markets, there’s substantial divergence: the most “expensive” countries are still trading at fairly high price/earnings multiples relative to history, while the most distressed countries are trading at historically depressed valuations.

Display 14

Price-to-Book Valuation for EM Countries Relative to DM

Through March 31, 2015

Source: AB

So from an investing perspective, the question is: Do you stick with perceived winners that have good fundamentals and are undergoing structural reform? Or do you invest in distressed countries on the assumption that mean reversion will lead to a rebound (Display 15)?

Display 15

EM Country Valuation Comparison: Last 20 Years

As of March 31, 2015

Source: AB

So far, most of our portfolios have been tilted toward Asian emerging-market stocks, which have stronger fundamental trends. However, we also see opportunity for active management. Wide valuation spreads point to a greater potential upside from stock selection, but aggregate valuations aren’t compelling enough to raise the overall market exposure.

Dynamics in bond markets are different, but the basic conclusion also holds true in that asset class: active management presents opportunities to add value by exploiting massive differences in interest rates and yield spreads (Display 16).

Display 16

EM: Sovereign-Bond Yields (5-Year)

As of March 31, 2015

Brazil 4-year; Chile 6-year for USD; Peru 6-year for local, 4-year for USD

Source: Bloomberg and AB

Current Recommendations

Our portfolios continue to overweight risk and reflation-sensitive assets. We expect improving nominal economic growth, sustained liquidity provision and continued accommodative monetary policy. Among risk assets, our largest overweights are in equities and energy, with more modest exposure to high-yield credit and an underweight in real estate investment trusts (REITs). Within equities, we favor cyclical sectors, non-US equities, and value approaches in Europe and Japan.

However, we believe exposure to income-generating investments is fairly important to manage our portfolio risk—particularly the potential for a reemergence of deflation fears like those that caused a second-half sell-off in 2014. That’s why we’re maintaining exposure to a variety of carry trades across assets. For example, we’re long US fixed income while shorting German Bunds and Japanese government bonds. We’ve also recently raised our portfolio exposure to European high-dividend-yield equities and dividend growers in Japan.

PERFORMANCE

March: Non-US Equities, Bonds, EM HY Up; Commodities Down

Notes
Equity Returns by Region
1 Mo. 3 Mo. 1 Yr. 3 Yr. 3-Yr. Percentile
Canada -1.9% 2.7% 7.8% 9.4% 67%
US -1.5 1.2 12.2 15.5 84
Japan 1.9 10.2 30.5 24.0 86
UK -2.0 4.0 6.1 9.2 33
Australia -0.1 10.4 14.1 16.4 77
Global -0.4 4.9 13.7 14.5 79
DM -0.4 4.9 14.0 15.6 75
Asia-Pac ex Japan 0.2 8.0 13.5 13.9 75
EU ex UK 2.7 15.2 18.8 18.0 84
EM 0.1 4.9 10.9 6.4 41
LatAm -1.2 1.2 2.0 -0.9 4
EU & MidEast -4.7 3.4 -0.2 1.4 37
Asia 0.9 5.7 14.3 8.2 45
Far East 1.4 5.8 12.9 7.2 42
Equity Global Sector Returns
1 Mo. 3 Mo. 1 Yr. 3 Yr. 3-Yr. Percentile
Energy -2.7% -1.2% -12.8% -1.7% 30%
Materials -3.9 4.8 2.0 0.7 45
Industrials -0.9 4.3 9.6 13.1 77
Consumer Discretionary 0.4 7.8 17.9 18.5 93
Consumer Staples -1.3 4.5 14.6 12.1 82
Healthcare 2.0 9.4 26.3 24.4 98
Financials 0.5 3.5 10.9 13.6 83
Technology -1.7 3.2 17.8 13.0 84
Telecom -2.4 4.7 9.1 9.8 84
Utilities -1.2 -2.1 6.3 6.1 71
Equity Risk Premium Returns
1 Mo. 3 Mo. 1 Yr. 3 Yr. 3-Yr. Percentile
Value 0.2% -0.9% 0.1% 2.7% 8%
Growth 0.7 1.0 0.1 3.0 21
Income -0.1 0.8 0.2 0.9 18
High Risk -0.8 2.7 0.5 1.8 70
High Beta -0.3 0.6 -2.3 -2.3 3
MN Quant 0.1 0.8 0.1 1.7 1
Bond Returns by Region
1 Mo. 3 Mo. 1 Yr. 3 Yr. 3-Yr. Percentile
Canada -0.4% 4.0% 10.6% 5.4% 24%
US 0.6 1.6 5.4 2.4 7
Japan 0.1 0.1 4.4 4.2 3
UK 2.0 3.5 16.2 6.7 33
Australia 0.8 3.1 14.2 6.6 31
DM 0.7 1.8 7.8 3.7 12
Asia-Pac ex Japan 0.6 2.3 9.9 3.6 39
Eurozone 1.0 3.4 13.0 8.1 63
EU ex UK 1.1 3.6 12.7 7.2 53
EM 0.2 1.9 6.9 3.8 9
Global Treasury 0.8 1.9 8.1 4.7 59
Bond Strategy Returns
1 Mo. 3 Mo. 1 Yr. 3 Yr. 3-Yr. Percentile
Global Inv. Grade -1.0% -1.2% -0.7% 3.1% 7%
Global High Yield -0.9 0.6 -2.2 6.4 24
EM Inv. Grade 0.2 2.0 6.0 4.5 5
EM High Yield 1.4 2.9 -1.0 4.7 6
Global Asset Backed -0.9 -1.2 -0.8 2.9 12
Duration 0.3 1.4 8.3 4.8 91
FI Carry 0.7 1.4 4.3 4.0 77
Commodities Spot Returns
1 Mo. 3 Mo. 1 Yr. 3 Yr. 3-Yr. Percentile
Dow Jones–UBS -5.1% -5.9% -27.0% -11.5% 1%
Natural Gas -4.7 -11.0 -45.0 -10.7 58
Industrial Metals -1.1 -5.3 -7.6 -10.2 15
Agriculture -5.4 -8.8 -29.0 -10.9 16
WTI Crude -8.7 -14.9 -52.4 -23.2 4
Brent Crude -12.3 -9.3 -51.7 -21.9 0
Gold Spot -2.4 -0.1 -7.8 -10.8 4
Spot Currency Returns
1 Mo. 3 Mo. 1 Yr. 3 Yr. 3-Yr. Percentile
JPY -0.4% -0.4% -14.1% -11.6% 2%
EUR -4.2 -11.3 -22.1 -7.0 15
GBP -4.0 -4.9 -11.1 -2.5 37
CAD -1.4 -8.4 -12.9 -7.7 0
AUD -2.6 -6.9 -17.9 -9.7 5
CHF -1.9 2.2 -9.0 -2.5 24
NOK -4.6 -7.5 -25.7 -10.9 5
CNY 1.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 66
USD 1.8 4.6 12.2 4.2 87

Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Please refer to Glossary for a description of return calculations and sources.
As of March 31, 2015
Source: AB

Attractiveness

Maintain Non-US Equities Overweight; EM Attractiveness Improves

Notes

Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Growth

Strong European Trends; US Expectations Lowered

Notes

Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Inflation

No Inflationary Pressures Outside Asset Appreciation

Notes

Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Credit/Sentiment

Broad Loan Growth Acceleration; Risk-Seeking Moments

Notes

Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Valuation (Equities/Bonds)

Few Deep Value Opportunities

Notes

Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Valuation (Currencies/Commodities)

Collapse in Commodities; Few Clear Signals on Currency Appreciation

Notes

Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Risk and Correlation

Correlations Average; Volatility Low

Notes

Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

© 2015 AllianceBernstein L.P.

Note to All Readers: The information contained here reflects the views of AllianceBernstein L.P. or its affiliates and sources it believes are reliable as of the date of this publication. AllianceBernstein L.P. makes no representations or warranties concerning the accuracy of any data. There is no guarantee that any projection, forecast or opinion in this material will be realized. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The views expressed here may change at any time after the date of this publication. This document is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. AllianceBernstein L.P. does not provide tax, legal or accounting advice. It does not take an investor’s personal investment objectives or financial situation into account; investors should discuss their individual circumstances with appropriate professionals before making any decisions. This information should not be construed as sales or marketing material or an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument, product or service sponsored by AllianceBernstein or its affiliates.

Note to Canadian Readers: This publication has been provided by AllianceBernstein Canada, Inc. or Sanford C. Bernstein & Co., LLC and is for general information purposes only. It should not be construed as advice as to the investing in or the buying or selling of securities, or as an activity in furtherance of a trade in securities. Neither AllianceBernstein Institutional Investments nor AllianceBernstein L.P. provides investment advice or deals in securities in Canada.

Note to European Readers: This information is issued by AllianceBernstein Limited, a company registered in England under company number 2551144. AllianceBernstein Limited is authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA – Reference Number 147956). This information is directed at Professional Clients only.

Note to Readers in Japan: This document has been provided by AllianceBernstein Japan Ltd. AllianceBernstein Japan Ltd. is a registered investment management company (registration number: Kanto Local Financial Bureau no. 303). It is also a member of the Japan Investment Advisers Association; the Investment Trusts Association, Japan; and the Type II Financial Instruments Firms Association. The product/service may not be offered or sold in Japan; this document is not made to solicit investment.

Note to Australian Readers: This document has been issued by AllianceBernstein Australia Limited (ABN 53 095 022 718 and AFSL 230698). Information in this document is intended only for persons who qualify as “wholesale clients,” as defined in the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth of Australia), and should not be construed as advice.

Note to New Zealand Readers: This document has been issued by AllianceBernstein New Zealand Limited (AK 980088, FSP17141). Information in this document is intended only for persons who qualify as “wholesale clients,” as defined by the Financial Advisers Act 2008 (New Zealand), and should not be construed as advice.

Note to Singapore Readers: This document has been issued by AllianceBernstein (Singapore) Ltd. (“ABSL”, Company Registration No. 199703364C). ABSL is a holder of a Capital Markets Services Licence issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore to conduct regulated activity in fund management and dealing in securities. AllianceBernstein (Luxembourg) S.à r.l. is the management company of the portfolio and has appointed ABSL as its agent for service of process and as its Singapore representative.

Note to Hong Kong Readers: This document is issued in Hong Kong by AllianceBernstein Hong Kong Limited (聯博香港有限公司), a licensed entity regulated by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission. This document has not been reviewed by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission.

Note to Readers in Vietnam, the Philippines, Brunei, Thailand, Indonesia, China, Taiwan and India: This document is provided solely for the informational purposes of institutional investors and is not investment advice, nor is it intended to be an offer or solicitation, and does not pertain to the specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any person to whom it is sent. This document is not an advertisement and is not intended for public use or additional distribution. AllianceBernstein is not licensed to, and does not purport to, conduct any business or offer any services in any of the above countries.

Note to Readers in Malaysia: Nothing in this document should be construed as an invitation or offer to subscribe to or purchase any securities, nor is it an offering of fund-management services, advice, analysis or a report concerning securities. AllianceBernstein is not licensed to, and does not purport to, conduct any business or offer any services in Malaysia. Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, AllianceBernstein does not hold a capital-markets services license under the Capital Markets & Services Act 2007 of Malaysia, and does not, nor does it purport to, deal in securities, trade in futures contracts, manage funds, offer corporate finance or investment advice, or provide financial-planning services in Malaysia.

MSCI Note: MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indices or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed or produced by MSCI.

Terms and Conditions

Please read these conditions carefully before using this site. By using this site, you signify your assent to the following terms and conditions of use without limitation or qualification. In particular, you consent to the use of all cookies on this website for the purposes described in the terms of use. If you do not agree to these terms or to the use of cookies as described below, do not use this site. AllianceBernstein may at any time revise these terms of use. You are bound by any such revisions and should therefore periodically visit this page to review the then current terms of use to which you are bound. This site is for informational purposes and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security which may be referenced herein.

Terms of Use

This site is solely intended for use by professional/institutional investors and institutional-investment industry consultants.

Do you wish to continue?